Model comparison
The Cove Studio vs The Span 30
Both are configurable expandable products, but they solve different briefs. The Cove Studio prioritises a shorter 20ft transport form and compact accommodation, while The Span 30 provides a broader 30ft envelope for more everyday living space.
Verified 21 September 2026Updated 21 September 2026
Quick decision
Which model fits the brief?
Choose The Cove Studio when compact guest, holiday or flexible accommodation is the priority and approximately 36.74 m2 is enough. Choose The Span 30 when the project needs a more generous two- or three-bedroom layout and approximately 56.52 m2 of expanded area.
Side-by-side
Compare the published starting points.
These are product-level references, not complete project quotations. Confirm current drawings, inclusions and site-specific scope before making a purchase decision.
| Decision point | The Cove Studio | The Span 30 |
|---|---|---|
| Product type | 20ft configurable expandable studio | 30ft configurable expandable home |
| Expanded area | Approx. 36.74 m2 | Approx. 56.52 m2 |
| Floor plans shown | 1, 2 or 3 bedrooms | One 2-bedroom and two 3-bedroom directions |
| Bathroom direction | Final set-out to confirm | 1 bathroom |
| Nominal transport size | 5,850 x 2,250 x 2,530mm | 9,000 x 2,250 x 2,530mm |
| Nominal expanded size | 5,850 x 6,280 x 2,530mm | 9,000 x 6,280 x 2,530mm |
| Indicative starting price | From $23,000 product only | From $49,500 product only |
| Best starting point | Compact guest, holiday or flexible accommodation | Broader compact living, family or regional projects |
Choose The Cove Studio when
Compact capacity is enough.
- The shortest expandable transport form is preferable for the preliminary access review.
- Approximately 36.74 m2 provides enough room for the intended guest, holiday or flexible accommodation brief.
- One-, two- or compact three-bedroom plan directions are worth testing against the site.
- A lower product starting point helps keep the first-stage scope compact.
Choose The Span 30 when
The brief needs more from the format.
- The project needs materially more living area than the 20ft format provides.
- A two- or three-bedroom layout with stronger everyday room separation is central to the brief.
- The site and delivery pathway can support the longer 30ft transport form and expanded footprint.
- The broader envelope is more important than minimising the initial product size.
Shared checks
What the model comparison cannot decide.
Product fit is only one part of the decision. These items remain specific to the property, supplier scope and intended use.
- 01The intended use and the planning or building approval pathway for the property.
- 02Truck access, turning space, lifting or placement method, gradients and overhead constraints.
- 03The complete opened footprint, setbacks, supports or foundations, drainage and service routes.
- 04Current supplier drawings, inclusions, engineering evidence, warranty terms and written pricing.
- 05Freight, placement, approvals, professional fees, site work, services, installation and optional upgrades.
Common questions
Before choosing between the two.
What is the main difference between The Cove Studio and The Span 30?Open
The Cove Studio uses a shorter 20ft transport format and opens to approximately 36.74 square metres. The Span 30 uses a 30ft transport format and opens to approximately 56.52 square metres, providing a broader envelope for two- or three-bedroom living.
Why does The Span 30 have a higher displayed starting price?Open
The displayed figures are indicative product starting points with different sizes, layouts and supplier scopes. They are not like-for-like complete project quotations. Compare current written inclusions, freight, placement, installation, services, site work and approvals before making a cost decision.
Is The Cove Studio easier to deliver than The Span 30?Open
Its shorter nominal transport length may help some access briefs, but delivery feasibility still depends on weight, width, height, turning space, gradients, overhead constraints and the proposed placement method. Both products need a site-specific access review.
Which product is more suitable for permanent living?Open
Neither product is automatically approved for permanent occupation. The intended use, property controls, construction evidence, siting, services and applicable planning and building pathway determine whether either option can support a residential project.
Can The Cove Studio really provide three bedrooms?Open
A compact three-bedroom direction appears in the current product references, but room dimensions, privacy, circulation, storage, openings and service set-out need careful review against current drawings before treating it as suitable for the intended occupants.
Evidence and scope
The Cove Studio
3 evidence records · Verified 14 September 2026
4 matters remain subject to supplier, project or site confirmation. Next review by 13 December 2026.
The Span 30
3 evidence records · Verified 14 September 2026
4 matters remain subject to supplier, project or site confirmation. Next review by 13 December 2026.
- Current Cove Studio and Span 30 supplier quotation and inclusion references
- Current one-, two- and three-bedroom supplier plan references
- ModuHaus product configuration, pricing scope and site-review notes
This comparison is general product information, not planning, building, engineering, certification or financial advice. Product specifications and pricing can change. Confirm the current written supplier scope and requirements for the property before proceeding.
How product data is verifiedPlanning Assessment
Compare the site before committing to the model.
Share the property, intended use and access details so ModuHaus can help turn the preferred product into a clearer project brief.